🔗 Share this article

This decision by the DNC to suppress the release regarding its own post-election analysis on the 2024 election seems shocking yet to be expected. Opposed to hard truths, the DNC operates more like a publicity machine than an electoral entity committed to cultivating grassroots capacities for winning elections.

A Climate That Avoids Dissent

Hesitant to break with the party establishment's culture of conformity, the committee has remained within the Biden-Harris shadow all through this past year. Making public such a report would have indicated whether the leadership actually want to foster open debate regarding the missteps which allowed the former president to return to the White House. Instead, the DNC is proceeding under the pretense that there's nothing to be learned following the stunning loss from the last cycle.

"Here’s our North Star: is this good for winning elections? If not, it’s a distraction from our fundamental goal," an explanation reportedly given for withholding the report.

Key Issues a Report Might Have Explored

Any valuable post-mortem with any value would not dodge a series of difficult topics. Among them are:

• Voter Disenchantment: The loss among millions of voters that backed the party's candidate in 2020 was decisive during the tight recent race.
• The Insistence to Seek Re-election: The stubborn decision by the incumbent to stay in the race, alongside a last-minute exit, is viewed as denying Democratic voters of open primaries.
• Losing Touch With Core Democratic Voters: During a time of inflation, the electoral effort reportedly ceding to corporate donors' interests without successfully attempting to confront the role of profit-seeking.
• A Gaza Factor: An unwillingness to adjust a stance regarding a major international conflict reportedly led to losing key demographic groups, notably with young people, Arab-Americans, and Muslim Americans.
• A Decline in Young Voter Allegiance: Extensive evidence demonstrates a major decline in votes for the candidate from voters aged 18-29.

A History of Evasion

This refusal is consistent with a recurring tendency to avoid hard truths. It recalls a situation in which virtually every Democratic officeholder in Washington supported a sitting president's insistence on running for re-election right up until a disastrous televised debate forced an exit.

Meanwhile, overwhelming numbers of Democratic voters were consistently telling surveyors that they opposed that candidate to be the nominee.

Campaign Spending Concerns

A substantive autopsy would also probe questions about campaign spending, such as the amounts flowed to high-priced advisors and advertising contractors during an electoral effort that burned through a colossal war chest in a short period.

The Larger Problem

Ultimately, the suppression surrounding this report highlights a submission to the existing power structure that oversaw an unsuccessful electoral effort. The message for the party's base – including millions of small donors – is that they do not have a right to understand what the leadership say they discovered from hundreds of interviews compiled from feedback from all states.

A party incapable to publicly examine its mistakes finds it difficult to escape the pattern that proved so advantageous to their opponents.