🔗 Share this article

Europe breathed a deep collective sigh of relief on Monday, as the diplomatic emergency sparked by the announcement of a new 28-point plan for ending the war appeared – briefly – to have been defused. A Washington representative spoke of "notable headway" after bilateral negotiations in Geneva. On Monday night, Moscow made its retaliation: a renewed assault of aerial bombardment on Kyiv.

The Cycle of Peace Talks and Military Action

The succession of contrasting events captured the bleak nature of the outgoing year. By day, diplomatic battles are fought: hopeful statements are issued from different nations. Considerable effort is devoted on managing particular approaches. By night, Moscow clearly shows the world that, for them, military action persists as the key method for achieving "peace".

After-Dark Attacks

As the offensive progressed into the early hours of Tuesday, the immediate reality of Ukraine's defenselessness was laid bare. Ukraine is capable of detecting projectile deployments from Russian territory, a capacity enabled by current data. From observation points, military aircraft that had been dispatched to intercept incoming aerial threats roared overhead – advanced fighter aircraft supplied to Ukraine by Western partners.

Soon thereafter, Kyiv's air-defence systems thundered: multiple launches deployed against a Russian ballistic missile. This was a modern interception technology at work, most likely supplied through allied countries. Every deployment shakes the surroundings, rattling buildings. The moment of terror quickly transforms into sober acceptance: perhaps the incoming missile won't strike its target this time, protecting urban areas from catastrophe and another blackout.

Persistent Threats

Soon after, a heavy machine gun engaged a drone close by, part of a defensive team – most likely allied-provided weaponry. Unfortunately, the shots failed to hit the hostile drone – it maintained course toward its objective.

Intermittently, this carried on until dawn. Kyiv greeted the early updates: seven people killed, damage and infrastructure problems in many homes as a result of the night's assault. As typically, everyone still maintained normal activities – living the war. But those full day illustrated Ukraine's critical military reliance on international aid – a need that regional partners are clearly incapable to fill in the short term.

Unsuccessful Negotiations

The detailed framework from US administration sparked intense emotion, discussion and profound anxiety – and momentarily shifted focus from Ukraine's major integrity crisis in years. Yet, we have witnessed similar scenarios, after earlier high-level meetings and international summits.

Every new initiative from US leadership follows the identical sequence: a political offensive against Ukraine, which Kyiv, with other European capitals, effectively counters. They manage the tension but never actually secure success. This cycle will, undoubtedly, continue.

Tactical Assessments

It is tempting to accuse specific actors of repeatedly advocating Kremlin's demands. But that does not seem to be the complete picture. Washington works based on a assumption well known to seasoned negotiators: you cannot achieve through diplomacy what you have failed to defend militarily. The American government presumes that it is unrealistic to pressure the Kremlin to relinquish the land that it currently occupies in Ukraine's south or east.

The problem is that while accepting these circumstances, American administration does little to discourage Russia, through diplomacy or military means, from thinking that the status quo will not evolve additionally in its favour in the months ahead.

Conflicting Perspectives

Therefore, the Kremlin is certain that the clock favors them – that Ukraine and its allies are nearing depletion. Their motivation to sign a deal that does not give them the largest achievable advantage is virtually nonexistent. There may be many attempts to end hostilities, but they will continue as long as Russia's leader remains highly assured in the result.

On the contrary, Ukrainian leadership believes that Ukraine can still endure, progressively conceding lives and land but averting a complete military breakdown until situations evolve in its favour.

Present Conditions

Realistically, there are no real preconditions for a truce. Now, personal considerations are coming into play: personal goals to negotiate peace and obtain worldwide acknowledgment, and the government's twin challenges – on one hand, not to distance important partners, and on the other, to unite the population around the flag against any proposal Kyiv finds unworkable, so that their priority does not move to domestic problems. And although their mission will now be considerably more difficult after recent developments, it remains quite doubtful that this will alter their fundamental strategy.

These two forces are guiding negotiations.

Summary and Prospects

It took a just a single week to terminate the proposed articles of the latest plan. Forceful and unpredictable management of the matter by Washington, opposition by Ukraine and the rest of Europe, along with calming attempts of diplomats, and finally, current information leaks, all served their function.

While new plans based on old ideas are forthcoming, Kyiv, London and other allied nations should draw one fundamental conclusion: Ukraine and Europe will only be able to fend off negotiation assaults from Washington that are founded on Moscow's terms and demonstrate certain reluctance to modify developments, if they remain united and enhance their military capacity at a much faster pace. If they do, no combination of diplomatic or military actions will be able to break them. In the meantime, Ukraine's capability to counter nocturnal attacks will, for the coming months, mainly require continued Western support.